Saturday, July 7, 2012

World Artist Network Celebrates Jackson Pollock's 100th Birthday with Community Painting


One of the contributors on the World Artist Network's Community Pollock-style Painting, created Saturday by visitors to the Bridgeport Arts Fest.
Photograph by Brandon T. Bisceglia.

Passersby splattered and dripped reds, yellows, blues and blacks onto a canvas laid out on State Street beside McLevy Green in Bridgeport Saturday afternoon. With each new flick of the wrist, the Jackson Pollock-style painting took on greater dimension.

The collaborators on this masterpiece, however, were not professional artists. They were visitors to the World Artist Network's booth at the Bridgeport Arts Fest.

The community painting project was the brainchild of WAN Director Valeria Garrido, who said she wanted a unique way to celebrate the centennial of the famous painter's birth in 1912.

Pollock was a pioneer of abstract expressionism in the middle of the twentieth century, and is best known for the seemingly paint-splashed pieces created during his “drip period.”

“People forget that Pollock was revolutionary in the 40's and 50's, including by making New York City, rather than Paris, the center of the art world,” said Garrido.

After adding their marks, those who contributed to the community painting were encouraged to add their names to a list of participants. Garrido said the list would be used to give credit to all the artists involved in the painting's creation.

WAN plans to show the painting, along with the contributors' credits, during the Bridgeport Art Trail in November. It may also be put out at other upcoming events.

WAN participated in the Bridgeport Arts Fest for the second year in a row, providing arts activities for children and adults as part of its “Artist for a Day” series of events. Also displayed were pieces of art for sale from around the world created by artists who are members of the nonprofit.

WAN's canopies along State Street.
Photograph by Brandon T. Bisceglia.

Friday, July 6, 2012

Tips on Arguing: Inductive Reasoning



In ancient Greece, philosophers and thinkers invented a process for arriving at truths about the world that we know today as deduction. These processes relied on taking general statements about the world and applying various logical rules to them in order to answer particular questions.

Deduction was enormously useful, especially in mathematics. It is deductive reasoning that led to the Pythagorean theorem, a general statement that works with every right triangle you will ever encounter.

Deduction had weaknesses, however, because it could give you answers that did not fit your observations. That was what drove the seventeenth-century English philosopher Francis Bacon to popularize a new way of organizing thought: induction.

Inductive reasoning takes deduction and flips it around. Instead of inventing axioms and applying them to specific observations, induction worked by collecting numerous observations and then deriving general principles from the amassed observations.

By giving precedence to observations over theories, Bacon's empirical approach provided a springboard for a great leap forward in the study of the natural sciences. If you collected 100 observations and 99 of them could not be explained with your current theory, the theory would have to be changed.

The modern scientific method is dependent upon inductive reasoning. However, Bacon himself warned against equating the two. Induction is only half of science. Eventually, enough observations have been collected to develop a strong theory.

At that point, the theory becomes the standard for future observations, thus allowing us to once again use deduction. Our observation of a heavier-than-air jet does not lead us to conclude that gravity is being violated – we know that the plane is in fact operating according to the rules of gravity. We also assume those rules are consistent, or else we could never be sure if the next jet would get off the ground.

Induction is incredibly versatile, and it encourages a healthy skepticism about statements that can't be verified by facts. If used properly, this form of reasoning is one of the best ways to align your ideas and beliefs with empirical reality.

Thursday, July 5, 2012

Important Books: Understanding Media


Marshall McLuhan holding a mirror in 1967.
Photograph by John Reeves through the Library and Archives Canada. Reference: 1980-194, PA-165118, MIKAN 4170003. Some rights reserved.
Marshall McLuhan changed the trajectory of media studies.

During the mid-twentieth century, McLuhan was a Professor of English literature at the University of Toronto. While there, he wrote a number of books that advanced several key concepts critical to modern theories of media, though some of his ideas would not become widely accepted until the spread and adoption of Internet technologies.

In 1964, McLuhan's seminal book, Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man, would launch the professor into the international spotlight. A younger generation thirsty for radical new ideas would embrace his work as prophetic. The established media and academic cultures, however, were more critical of his work. Both would frequently misinterpret his writing.

The main thesis of Understanding Media was that media can be assessed independent of content – that the form a communications medium takes is what determines how it will be used. The first chapter, titled “The Medium is the Message,” opened with a summary of this process: “This is merely to say that the personal and social consequences of any medium – that is, of any extension of ourselves – result from the new scale that is introduced into our affairs by each extension of ourselves, or by any new technology.”

Concurrent with this theme was another, more prophetic notion: that humanity is in transition between two major periods: the print era and the electric age. McLuhan saw the ability of electricity to deliver instantaneous information as the beginning of a paradigm shift that would cause people to slough off the fragmentation and mechanization engendered by the printed word while reconnecting with their tribal roots in a wider “global village” (a term McLuhan coined).

The second half of McLuhan's book tackled individual forms of media and their different impacts on life and culture. He pointed out, for instance, that literary-minded people who are accustomed to linear arguments and cohesive storytelling misunderstand the press, which, he noted, has tended “not to the book form, but to the mosaic or participational form...not a detached 'point of view,' but participation in process.”

In addition to books, television, and other formats that are traditionally thought of as media, McLuhan included chapters on cars, clocks, and electric light.

Ironically, Understanding Media can be difficult to understand, with passages that are at times dense and esoteric. Rather than approach the field in a systematic fashion, McLuhan often embedded his ideas in analogies and anecdotes. As Lewis H. Lapham describes in his introduction to the 1994 MIT Press edition, “quite a few of the notions to which he [McLuhan] off-handedly refers in the early pages, as if everybody already knew what he meant, he doesn't bother to explain until the later pages, often by way of an afterthought or an aside.”

Predictions about the coming electric age were one of the most controversial aspects of Understanding Media. McLuhan, who identified himself as a product of the literary world, nevertheless insisted that that the power of print would soon be overtaken by fundamentally different electric technologies.

Some predictions came true, such as his suggestion that televisions would become common in the classroom and shift the emphasis of education to reflect new expectations about becoming involved with processes, rather than simply learning about them. Other prognostications were slightly off the mark, such as the assertion that the car would be replaced by “electrical successors” within ten years.

McLuhan's predictions for the electric age were unpalatable to some for at least two major reasons. First of all, the dominant media and academic institutions of the time had built their legacies through print media, which McLuhan seemed to claim were doomed.

The second reason for skepticism is more understandable: many of the changes he foresaw were as yet barely imaginable. The first desktop computer was a decade away, and commercial Internet Service Providers wouldn't appear for more than twenty years. Cell phones, video games and Facebook were the stuff of science fiction.

Despite McLuhan's initial fame, much of his work lost traction during the 1970's. It would not be until a generation later that his books would get a fresh look – and now, with a burgeoning online culture, would make a lot more sense.

In fact, McLuhan's once-radical insight into how the forms of media shape our lives is a widely accepted, much-discussed topic today, and is obvious to anyone who has witnessed the changes wrought by Microsoft, Apple or Google. McLuhan, it turns out, truly was ahead of his time.