Christopher G. Donovan, Speaker of the
Connecticut. House of Representatives, on the opening day of the 2009 legislative session. Members of Donovan's campaign to replace Fifth
District Congressman Chris Murphy have come under scrutiny by federal
officials for allegedly concealing the sources of donations.
Photograph courtesy of Toasterb. Some
rights reserved.
|
The allegations against House Speaker
Chris Donovan's campaign finance director, Robert Braddock, Jr., and
an unknown number of co-conspirators are serious indeed. But any
cynical dismissal of Donovan (or politics more generally) as corrupt
is premature.
Donovan has reacted appropriately so
far. He fired key players in the controversy and is cooperating with
federal authorities. His first public statement was slow in coming,
but hit the right notes. He hasn't been charged with any wrongdoing,
and has said he didn't know that anyone might be trying to funnel
illegal contributions to his campaign.
That
denial is credible. Donovan's
personal role in the scandal appears to be tangential.
Braddock was a new face in Connecticut. And Donovan is well-known as
a crusader against the very types of influence-peddling now being
rooted out at the Capitol. Unless the federal investigation turns up
evidence that contradicts his statements, we must take him at his
word.
This doesn't mean that Donovan is off
the hook. He has
already accepted responsibility for signing off on campaign hires,
including Braddock. Going forward, he will need to be
honest and forthright with investigators and voters as the probe
continues. And he will need to redouble scrutiny of his own staff to
make sure he is not plagued by scandals in the future.
In the meantime, it's prudent to wait
for all of the facts to come out before making any judgments.
We shouldn't be surprised that
corruption exists – that's why we have campaign finance laws in the
first place. If anything, the discovery of these illegal
contributions is proof that vigilance and enforcement can keep
corruption from overtaking the system.
A version of this commentary was also published in the Connecticut Post.
A version of this commentary was also published in the Connecticut Post.
No comments:
Post a Comment